-
Bahasa Indonesia
-
English
Oleh: Vincent Gaspersz, Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt
American Society for Quality (www.asq.org) CMQ/OE, CQA, CSSBB, CQE, CQIA
American Production and Inventory Control Society (www.apics.org) CFPIM, CSCP
International Quality Federation (www.iqf.org) Six Sigma Master Black Belt
Registration Accreditation Board (www.exemplarglobal.org) Quality Management System Practitioner
“Education is the most powerful weapon we can use to change the world”
Nelson Mandela
Tantangan sekolah dan perguruan tinggi di Abad ke-21 semakin berat, karena banyak pihak bisnis dan industri sebagai pengguna langsung lulusan baru dari sekolah dan perguruan tinggi menanyakan di mana letak keunggulan suatu sekolah dan perguruan tinggi? sebagai FAKTA akan ke-TIDAK MAMPU-an sekolah dan perguruan tinggi dalam menghasilkan lulusan yang siap bekerja atau siap memasuki dunia bisnis dan industri? Seringkali kerangka berpikir dari lulusan baru itu juga dipertanyakan, karena mereka TIDAK MEMAHAMI apa-apa ketika memasuki dunia kerja. Gugatan seperti ini TELAH banyak dikemukakan di negara-negara maju yang dikenal memiliki bisnis dan industri modern.
Menyadari hal ini, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) yang terdiri dari 140,000 anggota berasal dari: pengawas, kepala sekolah, guru, dosen (professors), dan lain-lain dari 134 negara di dunia, serta mencakup lebih dari 56 anggota organisasi, melakukan langkah-langkah strategik untuk memperbaiki kurikulum, metode pembelajaran dan pengajaran agar MAMPU beradaptasi dengan kebutuhan dunia nyata di seluruh dunia.
ASCD (2004) kemudian mengadopsi Design Thinking for Education yang telah diuji coba dalam PRAKTEK sehingga memberikan hasil POSITIF. Kemudian pada tahun 2011 ASCD menerbitkan buku bagus sebagai panduan dalam pembuatan unit-unit modul pembelajaran berkualitas tinggi. Metode pembelajaran dan pengajaran yang dilakukan adalah menggunakan A-M-T (Acquisition, Meaning, Transfer) Learning Goals and Teaching Roles seperti bagan-bagan terlampir.
Jika memperhatikan A-M-T Learning Goals and Teaching Roles ini, maka kita akan bisa memperkirakan betapa rendahnya kualitas (kompetensi) lulusan sekolah dan perguruan tinggi, jika metode pembelajaran di sekolah dan perguruan tinggi itu TIDAK DIPERBAHARUI, yaitu: HANYA melakukan ringkasan langsung dari buku-buku teks yang bersifat TEORITIS dan mempresentasikan kembali ringkasan itu menggunakan power point saja. Model pembelajaran USANG seperti ini adalah belajar untuk sekedar memperoleh nilai kelulusan yang TIDAK BERKOMPETENSI (Learning for School) BUKAN menghasilkan lulusan yang MAMPU berkompetisi dan memiliki KOMPETENSI ketika melamar pekerjaan dalam dunia bisnis dan industri (Learning for Life).
Salam SUCCESS.
21st-century Learning: Learning For Life, Not Learning For School
By: Vincent Gaspersz, Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt
American Society for Quality (www.asq.org) CMQ/OE, CQA, CSSBB, CQE, CQIA
American Production and Inventory Control Society (www.apics.org) CFPIM, CSCP
International Quality Federation (www.iqf.org) Six Sigma Master Black Belt
Registration Accreditation Board (www.exemplarglobal.org) Quality Management System Practitioner
“Education is the most powerful weapon we can use to change the world”
Nelson Mandela
Challenges of schools and universities in the 21st Century is getting harder, because a lot of the businesses and the industries as direct users of new graduates from universities ask, where does the advantage of a certain school or university lie? As the FACT for the school or university’s INABILITY in producing graduates who are ready to work or ready to enter the world of business and industries. Often the framework of those new graduates are also questioned, because they DO NOT UNDERSTAND anything when entering the workforce. Many complaints, such as this, HAVE been expressed in many developed countries that are known to have modern businesses and industries.
Recognizing this, the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), consisting of 140,000 members from: supervisors, principals, teachers, lecturers (professors), and others from 134 countries in the world, and including more than 56 member organizations, undertook strategic measures to improve the curriculum, teaching and learning methods in order to be ABLE to adapt to the real-world needs all around the world.
ASCD (2004) then adopted a Design Thinking for Education which had been tested in PRACTICE; thus providing POSITIVE results. Then in 2011, ASCD published a good book as a guide in creating units of high-quality learning modules. The learning and teaching methods used were done using A-M-T (Acquisition, Meaning, Transfer) Learning Goals and Teaching Roles shown in the attached charts below.
If we pay attention to these AMT Learning Goals and Teaching Roles, then we will be able to estimate how low the quality (competence) of university graduates if the method of teaching in that school or university is NOT UPDATE, namely: ONLY do direct summaries from THEORETICAL textbooks and present those same summaries by just using PowerPoint. OUTDATED learning model like this is like learning to simply obtain a passing grade that is NOT competent (Learning for School). It DOES NOT produce graduates who are able to compete and have COMPETENCE when applying for jobs in the world of business and industries (Learning for Life).
Best Regards for SUCCESS.
